|
Begging The Question
|
||||
|
Wednesday, March 04, 2009
Tea Party protests against (cough) Stimulus bill have been popping up all over the country. As of yet they are not always well organized. I was signed up to received emails on them. I got the notification that there was one in my town 5 minutes before it was scheduled to start. On a workday. But continue to sprout up they have. I've read on some blogs that Rick Santelli should not be credited with creating the movement, since there were protests happening before his rant. I don't argue that, but Santelli did something just as important. He gave it a name.
Names matter. They can unify very un-unified events. They can give something context before even knowing what it is about. They make for an easy catch phase in the modern sound bite world. What Santelli did was to give a name to a huge amount of anger and disgust in the country about what the government is doing. I know it wasn't premeditated, but his selection stuck precisely because his anger at the government led him to make a historical analogy that was both well known and (in the minds of many) accurate. In his anger he equated the anger many are feeling toward the government's actions now with an act of unquestioned patriotism. He equated the taxing of Americans to pay for British debt to the taxing of Americans to pay for domestic business debt. This accomplished two goals at one time. Mainly it creates a context for the protests that the uniformed will automatically, even subconsiously, equate with what they know form school to be a profoundly patriotic act. Given that, it makes it more difficult for the opponents to demonize the protests, by the very fact that they are working uphill against the name before they even get to the rally's aims. Names matter. When liberals name a piece of legislation as the Fairness Doctrine, to mobilize public opinion against that you have to spend a lot of time explaining why the Fairness Doctrine isn't fair. When they name legislation the Employee Free Choice Act, much effort has to be exerted explaining why the intent of that law is the opposite of free choice. Branding matters. There is a reason why companies spend millions on it each year, and why politicians hire high priced consultants to brand images. Santelli may not have started the movement againt bail outs for failing businesses, but he deserves the credit for branding it and doing so brilliantly. *Small aside to President Obama and Democrats. Please stop spending my grandchildren's money. |
Recent Posts Milbarge's links
How Appealing
Volokh Conspiracy Crescat Sententia Sugar, Mr. Poon? SCOTUSblog E. McPan Southern Appeal Stay of Execution S.W. Va. Law Blog CrimLaw Sentencing L&P Begging to Differ Prettier Than Napoleon Favorable Dicta The Yin Blog De Novo PG: HtSoM Centinel Hot Librarian Blonde Justice Althouse PrawfsBlawg Concurring Opinions Crime & Federalism Orin Kerr Is That Legal? Prof. Bainbridge Frolics & Detours AppellateLaw&Practice Right Coast Abstract Appeal Clearly Erroneous Fresh Pepper? Side Salad The Wishbone Jeremy Blachman Overheard/Office Naked Drinking Coffee Legally Blonde Legal Underground WSJ Law Blog The Slog Trivial Pusuits Still Angry Crooked Timber The Conglomerate Heldman: Ignatz Don't Let's Start Screaming Bean Heidi Bond Stag Blog Legal Quandary Divine Angst ObsessiveLawStudent Things Thrown The Imbroglio Signifying Nothing Stuart Buck Legal Fiction Under. Robes NRO's Corner New Republic Balkinization Election Law Blog Legal Theory Blog Legal Ethics Forum Ernie the Attorney Intel Dump Disability Law Bag & Baggage Between Lawyers Becker-Posner Lessig Blog Crim Prof Blog White Collar Crime Tax Prof Blog Grits for Breakfast All Deliberate Speed Adventures of Chester College Basketball Blog College Football News Nomination Nation Inter Alia Stateline The Note Wonkette The Onion Slate Atlantic RJYH: Fanopticon Freakonomics Vice Squad Indiana Law Blog Field of Schemes Questionable Content Dilbert Blog Toothpaste for Dinner Pathetic Geek Stories AIM: milbargebtq Yahoo: btqmilbarge Milbarge Recommends ![]() Chuck Klosterman IV: A Decade of Curious People and Dangerous Ideas
Site Feeds
Search
Disclaimer The views presented here are personal and in no way reflect the view of my employer. In addition, while legal issues are discussed here from time to time, what you read at BTQ is not legal advice. I am a lawyer, but I am not your lawyer. If you need legal advice, then go see another lawyer. Furthermore, I reserve (and exercise) the right to edit or delete comments without provocation or warning. And just so we're clear, the third-party comments on this blog do not represent my views, nor does the existence of a comments section imply that said comments are endorsed by me. Technical Stuff
| |||