Begging The Question

Thursday, February 15, 2007

Rita/Claiborne Parody Songs
As regular readers know, I do song parodies from time to time. I've been moved to song a few times by the Blakely/Booker line of cases. To catch up, here's "Take a Walk on the Blakely Side," "Desperado," and my favorite, "'Twas the Night Before Booker." I've been a little lax, but with next week's big arguments in Rita and Claiborne coming up (see Prof. Berman for mucho info), the muse visited me again.

Of course, the obvious song for these cases is the Beatles' sprightly "Lovely Rita." It was tricky because it's such a spare little song with an odd meter that there's not much room to work with. (By comparison, "The Ballad of Mike Price, part 1 and part 2" were a piece of cake.) Still, it was kind of impossible to avoid the only pop song I know with "Rita" in the title, and plus it has that line about "a military man," when Rita's military service is an issue in his case. It's destiny. Anyway,

Victor Rita, Claiborne's Mate
Victor Rita, Claiborne's mate,
Reasonable minds can differ
Whether your sentence should be light
Or whether it should be stiffer.

Claiborne's judge must be a reader,
'Cause in a move out of tragic theater
He gave a lower sentence in an Eighth Circuit court.
Rita's thought he'd be a cheater
If he made the sentence sweeter,
He didn't vary downward for a military man.

Claiborne/Rita, they presumed
Your sentences were the right ones,
Will the Court now choose to make them undone?
Wrote the brief, it's such a winner,
And your lawyer is no beginner,
Gonna get you home before the end of the year.
Scalia, Thomas are both on your side,
With Johnny Roberts, it'll be a landslide,
Tony, Steve, and Sam can only sit there and sneer.

Oh, Victor Rita, I presume
Claiborne and you will win there.
I only hope that what they write
Will warrant all the fanfare!

And, as a bonus, to the tune of "Easy (Like Sunday Morning)" by Lionel Richie and the Commodores, I imagine a Justice in the Blakely/Cunningham majority eager to go the next step with Rita and Claiborne. Feel free to imagine which Justice I'm thinking of, and to debate whether the outcome of these new cases really is dictated by the precedents (i.e., whether it's easy).

Easy Like Rita/Claiborne
Know it sounds funny but I just can't stand the wait,
Wish the hearing was tomorrow.
Gonna prove I can vote for a prison inmate,
Those who doubted me will feel sorrow.
That's why I'm easy, I'm easy like Rita/Claiborne.
That's why I'm easy, easy like Rita/Claiborne.

Why in the world would the lower courts disagree?
I thought I'd floored 'em all with my genius.
Cunningham shoulda warned 'em they were getting it wrong,
It's like they're trying hard to demean us.
Yeah, that's why I'm easy, I'm easy like Rita/Claiborne.
That's why I'm easy, easy like Rita/Claiborne.

It's gonna be fun, so fun,
It's gonna be fun to tell 'em all
How much I'm right.
I'll write with such glee...you'll see.

That's why I'm easy, I'm easy like Rita/Claiborne.
That's why I'm easy, easy like Rita/Claiborne.
Because I'm easy, I'm easy like Rita/Claiborne.
Because I'm easy, easy like Rita/Claiborne.



Wednesday, February 14, 2007

For Old Times' Sake...

Monday, February 12, 2007

Seen Around the Interweb
1. A clarification re: the astronut. Obviously, the diaper thing has been the memorable detail. But I've heard comedian after comedian make a joke about how Lisa Nowak drove 900 miles wearing diapers (implying she wore one diaper the whole way), but noting that she must have stopped for gas at least once along the trip. Well, duh. According to the police affidavit (via Slate), Nowak stopped at a hotel along the way from Houston to Orlando. So, I imagine she wore the diapers for the driving portion of the trip, and probably took them off during stops.

Also, weirdly, Nowak paid cash on her trip, presumably to avoid a "paper trail," but then saved the receipts. They were found in her car! Why pay cash if you're going to keep the receipts? What, is she going to write the expenses off on her taxes?

2. Speaking of Slate, ever since their latest redesign, I've been peeved by their use of the multi-page format for many stories. (An example; scroll to bottom.) I understand: it's all about ad revenue. But, the "jump" doesn't seem to have any correlation with the length of the story. If I'm going to click to a second page, I want it to be worth it. I don't want to get a measly paragraph or two for my trouble. It's ridiculous to act as if you couldn't cram that onto the front page of the story. So, I often skip the second page just out of spite. Sometimes, I use the "view as single page" option, which is a nice touch. But I have two minor problems with that feature. First, I have to scroll all the way down to the end of the text to find that option. I might as well read my way down. They should make that option available at the top of the page, before I begin reading. That would tip me off it's a longish story, and would allow me to avoid the second irk. That is, if I do scroll down and click on "view as single page," the page I see starts in media res, at the point of the jump. So I have to scroll all the way back up to the top to start reading the story. Arg! That makes no sense. Either use a popout if you have to (like Volokh does sometimes, although not ideal for these purposes), or give me the option of seeing the story on a single page at the top, before I wear out the scroll button on my mouse. Here endeth the rant.

3. This is a sad story, but I predict it will get even sadder. A Duke student reported over the weekend that she was raped at an off-campus party. It's not known whether the suspect is a Duke student as well. While this case should be evaluated on its own merits, I have no doubt it will get tied into the ongoing Duke lacrosse mess. I'm sure there will be lots of second-guessing no matter how Durham D.A. Mike Nifong handles the case, and his track record indicates that such skepticism is well-founded. Let's hope justice prevails here as well.

4. Speaking of justice and how it gets denied sometimes, The Economist has an interesting story about the Japanese judicial system. Some 95% of people arrested confess to the charges, and cases end in convictions 99.99% of the time. "Prosecutors are ashamed of being involved in an acquittal and fear that losing a case will destroy their careers. Judges get promotion for the speed with which they process their case-loads." Critics say that many confessions are obtained via coercive tactics. I don't expect the Supreme Court to cite this example of international law in its next Miranda decision.

5. Finally, sigh.



Recent Posts

  • This blog has moved
  • ThunderCats!
  • Under Construction
  • The real question: Why am I reading this?
  • If I had my way, I would tear this whole building ...
  • Good enough for government work
  • The Me Decade (for the right price)
  • Cautiously Optimistic About 2010
  • 50 Book Challenge
  • Read something I wrote somewhere else!


  • Milbarge's links

    How Appealing
    Volokh Conspiracy
    Crescat Sententia
    Sugar, Mr. Poon?
    SCOTUSblog
    E. McPan
    Southern Appeal
    Stay of Execution
    S.W. Va. Law Blog
    CrimLaw
    Sentencing L&P
    Begging to Differ
    Prettier Than Napoleon
    Favorable Dicta
    The Yin Blog
    De Novo
    PG: HtSoM
    Centinel
    Hot Librarian
    Blonde Justice
    Althouse
    PrawfsBlawg
    Concurring Opinions
    Crime & Federalism
    Orin Kerr
    Is That Legal?
    Prof. Bainbridge
    Frolics & Detours
    AppellateLaw&Practice
    Right Coast
    Abstract Appeal
    Clearly Erroneous
    Fresh Pepper?
    Side Salad
    The Wishbone
    Jeremy Blachman
    Overheard/Office
    Naked Drinking Coffee
    Legally Blonde
    Legal Underground
    WSJ Law Blog
    The Slog
    Trivial Pusuits
    Still Angry
    Crooked Timber
    The Conglomerate
    Heldman: Ignatz
    Don't Let's Start
    Screaming Bean
    Heidi Bond
    Stag Blog
    Legal Quandary
    Divine Angst
    ObsessiveLawStudent
    Things Thrown
    The Imbroglio
    Signifying Nothing
    Stuart Buck
    Legal Fiction
    Under. Robes
    NRO's Corner
    New Republic
    Balkinization
    Election Law Blog
    Legal Theory Blog
    Legal Ethics Forum
    Ernie the Attorney
    Intel Dump
    Disability Law
    Bag & Baggage
    Between Lawyers
    Becker-Posner
    Lessig Blog
    Crim Prof Blog
    White Collar Crime
    Tax Prof Blog
    Grits for Breakfast
    All Deliberate Speed
    Adventures of Chester
    College Basketball Blog
    College Football News
    Nomination Nation
    Inter Alia
    Stateline
    The Note
    Wonkette
    The Onion
    Slate
    Atlantic
    RJYH: Fanopticon
    Freakonomics
    Vice Squad
    Indiana Law Blog
    Field of Schemes
    Questionable Content
    Dilbert Blog
    Toothpaste for Dinner
    Pathetic Geek Stories

    AIM: milbargebtq
    Yahoo: btqmilbarge

    Milbarge Recommends

    Chuck Klosterman IV: A Decade of Curious People and Dangerous Ideas
    Chuck Klosterman IV: A Decade of Curious People and Dangerous Ideas

    The Men Who Stare at Goats
    The Men Who Stare at Goats

    O.C.M.S.O.C.M.S.



    Site Feeds

    Subscribe with myFeedster
    Subscribe with Bloglines
    Subscribe with Feed Burner
    Subscribe with Blogstreet

    Search
    Google
    Web BTQ
    Disclaimer

    The views presented here are personal and in no way reflect the view of my employer. In addition, while legal issues are discussed here from time to time, what you read at BTQ is not legal advice. I am a lawyer, but I am not your lawyer. If you need legal advice, then go see another lawyer.

    Furthermore, I reserve (and exercise) the right to edit or delete comments without provocation or warning. And just so we're clear, the third-party comments on this blog do not represent my views, nor does the existence of a comments section imply that said comments are endorsed by me.

    Technical Stuff

    Powered by Blogger
    FeedBurner.com

    Weblog Commenting by HaloScan.com

    Listed on Blogwise
    Blogarama - The Blog Directory
    Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.



    < A Legally Inclined Weblog >