|
Begging The Question
|
||||
|
Wednesday, July 05, 2006
Sorry for being silent so long. One thing after another....
Anyway, a few things that have been on my mind. 1. So Ken Lay died today. Here is an interesting story about how various editors at Wikipedia reacted by changing Lay's entry to reflect that the cause of death was a heart attack or suicide, with heart attack apparently winning out. I was joking with Fitz-Hume this morning about how soon people would start suggesting that Lay faked his death, but in fact such speculation started almost immediately. (See this post at the WSJ Law Blog for some representative comments.) Of course, some people had been suggesting Lay would flee the country before his sentencing anyway, so they probably weren't surprised by this development. I'll note for the record that I have no real doubt that Lay is actually dead, and won't demand his body be displayed al-Zarqawi-style to prove it. But if I had Lay's money, and motivation, I'd give faking it some thought. Or maybe I just have those thoughts after watching Body Heat. 2. Speaking of movies intruding on my real life lately, I watched Marathon Man for the first time this weekend. And the next day I got a postcard from my dentist reminding me to schedule a checkup. I think I may put that off a while. 3. I'm sure NASA enjoyed all the "rockets' red glare" headlines it got by launching a shuttle on July 4 despite finding "a pencil-size crack in the foam insulation around the shuttle's fuel tank." Remind me again why we're still pouring money into the shuttle program? 4. A couple of weeks ago, The Stranger ran its Queer Issue. (as opposed to the others?) Some funny items, and some serious ones -- lots of good stuff, actually; worth checking all the links. Anyway, Dan Savage had an essay about gay adoption. (Savage and his husband have an adopted son.) Savage's modest proposal was that proposed gay adoption bans also include already-adopted kids. After all, he notes, if kids are so bad off with gay parents, why let the ones who are with them now stay? Savage thinks that the specter of yanking real, non-hypothetical kids away from actual, non-straw-men parents and tossing them into fetid foster care systems would highlight the need for loving adoptive parents of any stripe. (Note that the Arkansas Supreme Court did the right thing on this issue last week.) First, Savage's idea is pretty clearly unconstitutional -- I'm fairly certain that due process would require an individualized best-interests-of-the-child determination as opposed to retroactively declaring thousands of parents unfit. Of course, it's been a while since I've taken Family Law, so I'm open to rebuttal. But while Savage may be right about the sensibilities of his fellow Washingtonians, I think he's better be careful what he wishes for. There are plenty of state legislatures who would gladly accept his terms. 5. I had a great time last week posting some Supreme Court thoughts at De Novo. The very end of the term coincided with the "one thing after another" mentioned above, so I kind of withered and didn't end it with the showstopping number I was hoping for. Oh well. I have to say I'm not terribly excited over any of the final opinions. I have to agree with Prof. Kerr's overall term analysis. I may try to cobble together the last few thoughts pinging around in my brain into a coherent post, but I won't impose at De Novo any longer. I do encourage you to check out the posts in our little conversation, though. There are some very good ones and much thought-provocation. In fact, we seemed to have helped inspire a few thoughts from Prof. Berman. Thanks again to PG and Will for playing along. 6. Via Steve Minor, I see this neat post about a citizenship ceremony at Monticello on the 4th. It reminded me of a ceremony I went to not too long ago. What really struck me was how happy the judge was. I suppose almost every case in federal court involves at least one party who is in bad shape, and they're rarely much fun. So I'm sure it was a blast for the judge to engage in some happy business from the bench. The judge even allowed relatives to take pictures, and my guess is that even David Souter would be okay with that. I love the oath, especially the part about forsaking any allegiance to foreign princes and potentates. The judge urged the new citizens to vote and take part in jury duty. Those were some happy, happy folks, and it made me feel good as an American to know that my country is still worth choosing. These ceremonies are held fairly regularly in district courtrooms everywhere, and I highly recommend checking one out. Monday, July 03, 2006
Alternative post title: How can something so small make so much of something so disgusting?
As alluded to earlier by Milbarge and myself, I recently became the proud father of a healthy baby girl. My wife and I are one week into this whole parenting experiment, so I feel obligated to share my expertise.
|
Recent Posts Milbarge's links
How Appealing
Volokh Conspiracy Crescat Sententia Sugar, Mr. Poon? SCOTUSblog E. McPan Southern Appeal Stay of Execution S.W. Va. Law Blog CrimLaw Sentencing L&P Begging to Differ Prettier Than Napoleon Favorable Dicta The Yin Blog De Novo PG: HtSoM Centinel Hot Librarian Blonde Justice Althouse PrawfsBlawg Concurring Opinions Crime & Federalism Orin Kerr Is That Legal? Prof. Bainbridge Frolics & Detours AppellateLaw&Practice Right Coast Abstract Appeal Clearly Erroneous Fresh Pepper? Side Salad The Wishbone Jeremy Blachman Overheard/Office Naked Drinking Coffee Legally Blonde Legal Underground WSJ Law Blog The Slog Trivial Pusuits Still Angry Crooked Timber The Conglomerate Heldman: Ignatz Don't Let's Start Screaming Bean Heidi Bond Stag Blog Legal Quandary Divine Angst ObsessiveLawStudent Things Thrown The Imbroglio Signifying Nothing Stuart Buck Legal Fiction Under. Robes NRO's Corner New Republic Balkinization Election Law Blog Legal Theory Blog Legal Ethics Forum Ernie the Attorney Intel Dump Disability Law Bag & Baggage Between Lawyers Becker-Posner Lessig Blog Crim Prof Blog White Collar Crime Tax Prof Blog Grits for Breakfast All Deliberate Speed Adventures of Chester College Basketball Blog College Football News Nomination Nation Inter Alia Stateline The Note Wonkette The Onion Slate Atlantic RJYH: Fanopticon Freakonomics Vice Squad Indiana Law Blog Field of Schemes Questionable Content Dilbert Blog Toothpaste for Dinner Pathetic Geek Stories AIM: milbargebtq Yahoo: btqmilbarge Milbarge Recommends ![]() Chuck Klosterman IV: A Decade of Curious People and Dangerous Ideas
Site Feeds
Search
Disclaimer The views presented here are personal and in no way reflect the view of my employer. In addition, while legal issues are discussed here from time to time, what you read at BTQ is not legal advice. I am a lawyer, but I am not your lawyer. If you need legal advice, then go see another lawyer. Furthermore, I reserve (and exercise) the right to edit or delete comments without provocation or warning. And just so we're clear, the third-party comments on this blog do not represent my views, nor does the existence of a comments section imply that said comments are endorsed by me. Technical Stuff
| |||