|
Begging The Question
|
||||
|
Sunday, November 23, 2003
Welcome to the blog. I guess the easiest way to fill this space is the tired literary device of an imaginary question-and-answer session. If you have one and it isn't here, feel free to make the session less imaginary by emailing us.
Q: Can something be "less imaginary"? Either it is imaginary or it isn't, right? A: Quiet, you. Q: Why "Begging the Question"? A: I had been thinking about starting a blog for a while, but one of the biggest drawbacks was that I would have to come up with a name. Recently, in several places within a short span, I saw someone commit one of my biggest pet peeve grammar mistakes. They used the phrase "begs the question" essentially literally. That is, they meant, "raises the question" or "suggests the question." Of course, that's not what it means. "Begging the question" is the logical fallacy of assuming the conclusion of your argument. Anyway, I got sufficiently peeved about this and decided to use the phrase as the name of my blog. Having made that decision, the rest was easy. Q: Blogs are just a waste of time. I don't like to waste my time. Therefore, I won't read your blog. A: That's not a question, but it is a good example of an argument that begs the question. Q: So your blog is just going to be a compendium of common grammar and logic mistakes? A: Heavens no. That would be a waste of time. In fact, I can pretty much guarantee plenty of both on our part here. It's going to be fairly unstructured, more or less our thoughts on whatever moves us to write. I'll start what is sure to be a trend: stealing from other bloggers. One of my favorite blog names is Life, Law, Libido. I don't read it as often as I should, but I think that name sums up the kind of things you can expect to see here, if you read "libido" to mean anything that stirs our passions. Q: You say "we" and "us" a lot. Are you being pretentious or are there really more than one of you? A: Probably both. There are two of us writing here for now, although we will consider offers to join up. Both of us are lawyers. I (Milbarge) clerk for one of the federal courts of appeals, and Fitz-Hume works for the legislature of a sparsely populated western state. I'm from a small Appalachian town, and Fitz-Hume is from Texas originally. Fitz-Hume is doing most of (read: all) the code and technical stuff, and I'm probably going to end up providing most of the content because I don't have a life to spend my time on. Q: Why Milbarge and Fitz-Hume? A: We decided to use aliases for professional reasons. Neither of us expects to have to defend this blog at a confirmation hearing, but it's just easier to avoid the appearance of impropriety. We decided on "Fitz-Hume & Milbarge" from the classic 1985 Cold War spoof "Spies Like Us." I will note that the Foreign Service Board cheating scene clearly shows that Austin Milbarge is a lefty, by the way: Check him out writing the answer to Emmett Fitz-Hume's question, "What does KGB stand for?" Anyway, there's no real reason for this other than we like the movie. Well, if you have any questions or comments, feel free to email us at BTQblog (at) gmail.com, or use the "comments" function. We're happy to hear from you. We hope you enjoy the blog. |
Recent Posts Milbarge's links
How Appealing
Volokh Conspiracy Crescat Sententia Sugar, Mr. Poon? SCOTUSblog E. McPan Southern Appeal Stay of Execution S.W. Va. Law Blog CrimLaw Sentencing L&P Begging to Differ Prettier Than Napoleon Favorable Dicta The Yin Blog De Novo PG: HtSoM Centinel Hot Librarian Blonde Justice Althouse PrawfsBlawg Concurring Opinions Crime & Federalism Orin Kerr Is That Legal? Prof. Bainbridge Frolics & Detours AppellateLaw&Practice Right Coast Abstract Appeal Clearly Erroneous Fresh Pepper? Side Salad The Wishbone Jeremy Blachman Overheard/Office Naked Drinking Coffee Legally Blonde Legal Underground WSJ Law Blog The Slog Trivial Pusuits Still Angry Crooked Timber The Conglomerate Heldman: Ignatz Don't Let's Start Screaming Bean Heidi Bond Stag Blog Legal Quandary Divine Angst ObsessiveLawStudent Things Thrown The Imbroglio Signifying Nothing Stuart Buck Legal Fiction Under. Robes NRO's Corner New Republic Balkinization Election Law Blog Legal Theory Blog Legal Ethics Forum Ernie the Attorney Intel Dump Disability Law Bag & Baggage Between Lawyers Becker-Posner Lessig Blog Crim Prof Blog White Collar Crime Tax Prof Blog Grits for Breakfast All Deliberate Speed Adventures of Chester College Basketball Blog College Football News Nomination Nation Inter Alia Stateline The Note Wonkette The Onion Slate Atlantic RJYH: Fanopticon Freakonomics Vice Squad Indiana Law Blog Field of Schemes Questionable Content Dilbert Blog Toothpaste for Dinner Pathetic Geek Stories AIM: milbargebtq Yahoo: btqmilbarge Milbarge Recommends ![]() Chuck Klosterman IV: A Decade of Curious People and Dangerous Ideas
Site Feeds
Search
Disclaimer The views presented here are personal and in no way reflect the view of my employer. In addition, while legal issues are discussed here from time to time, what you read at BTQ is not legal advice. I am a lawyer, but I am not your lawyer. If you need legal advice, then go see another lawyer. Furthermore, I reserve (and exercise) the right to edit or delete comments without provocation or warning. And just so we're clear, the third-party comments on this blog do not represent my views, nor does the existence of a comments section imply that said comments are endorsed by me. Technical Stuff
| |||